CC
CLOROX CO /DE/ (CLX)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY25 results missed on the top line and non-GAAP EPS: net sales fell 8% to $1.668B and adjusted EPS declined 15% to $1.45, as category slowdowns, price/mix headwinds, and Household destocking offset robust cost savings; gross margin expanded for the 10th straight quarter to 44.6% .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue missed ($1.718B* est. vs $1.668B actual) and adjusted/Primary EPS missed ($1.56* est. vs $1.45 actual), while Q1–Q2 had both revenue and EPS beats; EBITDA also trailed consensus in Q3* .
- FY25 guidance: GAAP net sales narrowed to down 1% to flat (from down 1% to up 2%), gross margin raised to about +150 bps, GAAP EPS raised to $5.73–$6.13, adjusted EPS maintained at $6.95–$7.35; outlook now includes tariff headwinds and higher ERP pre‑shipment benefits that will reverse in 1H FY26 .
- Call tone: management sees temporary category pressure, limited trade-down so far, and plans tariff mitigation (sourcing, reformulation, targeted pricing); Q4 gross margin implied ~44% with some timing/tariff/Household inventory reductions, keeping the margin expansion narrative intact near term .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- 10th consecutive quarter of gross margin expansion (44.6%, +240 bps YoY) on cost savings and mix (post-divestitures) .
- Health & Wellness grew net sales 3% on +7 pts volume; segment adjusted EBIT up 10% on lower manufacturing/logistics costs and savings .
- Management reiterated confidence in brand strength and resilience despite macro volatility: “we held overall market shares and delivered our 10th consecutive quarter of gross margin expansion” — Linda Rendle, CEO .
-
What Went Wrong
- Consolidated net sales declined 8% to $1.668B as unfavorable price/mix and category slowdowns weighed; organic sales fell 2% with flat organic volume .
- Household was weakest: sales -11% (volume -9%; higher trade spend) and segment adjusted EBIT -18%, with late-quarter retailer inventory adjustments and timing issues in Kingsford and Litter .
- Adjusted EPS fell 15% to $1.45 (vs $1.71 LY) on lower sales; competitive promotions (notably in Glad) and retailer inventory actions pressured price/mix and shipments .
Financial Results
Headline quarterly trend (oldest → newest):
Q3 FY25 vs S&P Global consensus:
Note: Asterisks indicate values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment performance – Q3 FY25:
KPIs and other items:
Non-GAAP adjustments Q3 FY25 (per share): cyberattack insurance recoveries (-$0.21), digital capabilities investment (+$0.16); adjusted EPS $1.45 vs GAAP $1.50 .
Guidance Changes
Management quantified tariffs as a ~$100M 12‑month run-rate headwind with ~$10–$20M in Q4 as inventory rolls through .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “In the third quarter, heightened macroeconomic uncertainties drove changes in shopping behaviors… We still expect to deliver organic sales growth and another year of strong earnings growth.” — Linda Rendle, CEO .
- “Our exposure to tariffs is relatively limited… the unmitigated impact we expect is a 12‑month run rate of about $100 million… ~$10–$20 million in Q4 as inventory rolls through. We’ll offset over time via sourcing, supply chain changes, reformulations, productivity and targeted pricing.” — Luc Bellet, CFO .
- “We expect gross margin in Q4 to be about 44%… aligned with the full‑year average (~44.5%), with Q3 favorable timing reversing in Q4 and a ~$10–$20 million tariff impact.” — Luc Bellet, CFO .
- “Retailer inventory reductions were limited to Household late in the quarter… not a strategic issue; we’re not seeing consumer out‑of‑stocks.” — Linda Rendle, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Consumer/category outlook: Categories weakened mid‑February; Q4 categories expected down low-single digits; consumers shifting channels and pack sizes but not trading down meaningfully yet .
- Tariffs: ~$100M annualized cost headwind; limited exposure helps; targeted pricing plus sourcing/productivity levers planned; Q4 P&L impact ~$10–$20M .
- Gross margin cadence: Q4 implied ~44% with Q3 timing reversal, slightly stronger cost savings, and tariff headwind; consistent with ~44.5% FY average .
- Retail inventory/destocking: Modest at total company (<1 pt Q3), concentrated in Household; more expected in Q4, embedded in guidance .
- ERP transition build/reversal: Retailers building ~1.5 weeks of inventory pre‑go‑live; benefit variability ~1–2 pts per 1–2 days; reversal mainly Q1 FY26 .
Estimates Context
Consensus vs actuals (S&P Global) — last three quarters:
- Q3: revenue and EPS missed consensus; Q1–Q2 both revenue and EPS beat. Current FY25 adjusted EPS guidance of $6.95–$7.35 brackets the S&P Global FY25 EPS consensus of ~$7.06*, but with a larger ERP pre‑shipment contribution that reverses in 1H FY26 .
Note: Asterisks indicate values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter’s miss was largely top‑line: Household destocking, competitive promotions (Glad), and price/mix pressure outweighed continued cost savings, even as GM rose to 44.6% .
- Guidance quality mixed: sales outlook trimmed (down 1% to flat) but GAAP EPS raised and gross margin nudged higher; adjusted EPS unchanged as tariff costs and category softness offset stronger ERP pre‑shipments .
- Tariffs are the new swing factor (~$100M annualized); watch mitigation execution (sourcing, reformulation, productivity, targeted pricing) and Q4–FY26 flow‑through .
- ERP transition will pull demand into Q4 (retailers building ~1.5 weeks), bolstering FY25 but creating a reversal headwind mainly in Q1 FY26 — a setup to monitor for early FY26 .
- Segment mix matters: Health & Wellness remains a relative bright spot (volume‑led growth, EBIT up 10%), while Household requires tighter promo/pricing discipline amid elevated competitive discounting .
- Margin expansion remains the core bull point near term (Q4 GM ~44% implied), but sustaining it through tariff headwinds and category volatility is the key medium‑term test .
- Optionality into FY26+: portfolio moves (Glad JV end and purchase of P&G’s 20% stake in Jan 2026) and ongoing digital/ERP productivity could support the 25–50 bps annual EBIT margin expansion ambition when macro normalizes .